The Best Format for File Sharing
February 2, 2011 by admin
Filed under Types of File Sharing
A PDF document is in full a Portable Document Format document. The main idea of having it is so that one can share certain files between computers whose compatibility between normal word processing formats is unknown. Therefore, it is a one file for all computers format. With PDF files, one can have lock and security features to bar unwarranted spying on somebody’s documents. Read this if you want to learn how to convert Word to PDF format.
Click Here and Get Tips for Protection in File Sharing!!
If you need to change the Word doc’s format to PDF, you first have to open it. It is not a difficult process changing the Word to PDF. To open the file, just point the cursor on it and double click it. This will have the file open in no time. When it comes to saving, you should click the option in the menu bar. Now, there are two possibilities of saving the file depending first on the version of Word that you use to make your documents. Some will have a PDF icon from which if you select, the file will save as such. Others have the option in the Save As Of you have to use the drop down menu to save as a PDF File, do that by selecting File name (this will bring a menu) then out of these, choose PDF.
Click Here and Get Tips for Protection in File Sharing!!
The name of the document can be altered if you feel like. You can define where on your computer the file should be saved. You can calibrate the manner in which the file will behave once you publish. Tell it whether it can open or not. 
Click Here and Get Tips for Protection in File Sharing!!
When you are choosing the options for publishing, you have the option of selecting if you want the file to appear as a standard file (capable of both online publishing tasks and just normal printing) or ‘minimum size’ file, which can be only used for online publishing purposes. You can now select publish if you have these options in check. Therefore, the file might open if you wanted it to be doing so when you click publish. Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Jake_Langston
Click Here for Your Special File Sharing Protection Offer!!
Ethical Issues Behind P2P File Sharing
February 2, 2011 by admin
Filed under Latest Updates
You’ve probably heard bout peer to peer technology which is basically a way of allowing internet users to exchange files online. It provides a very convenient way of gaining access to music, movies and other types of digital information. A lot of debates have been going on about file sharing and whether or not it should be allowed. Whatever the results of these discussions, however, don’t look like they matter enough because right now, file-sharing happens a lot and there seems to be no stopping it.
Click Here and Get Tips for Protection in File Sharing!!
Back the 1990′s, an online company called Napster introduced this technology of file sharing which made it very easy for people to listen to music or watch movies without having to pay. On the other hand, this began to hurt for creators of these media who then found it very difficult to protect their intellectual property rights. Reproducing these movies and music cd’s was very easy and all of these eventually sparked a controversy that resulted in Napster being shut down by a court ruling that said it violated copyright infringement laws.
Today, long after Napster was gone, P2P technology still remains and so do the debates about the ethical issues it brings. A conflict of views and values continues because people have not stopped either creating file sharing websites or downloading information from these sites. It seems as though nobody just would not want even the law to restrict the freedom they enjoy on the Internet. These P2P site owners and sharers believe that the web is a free zone where people can do anything they want without having to consider legal issues.
Click Here and Get Tips for Protection in File Sharing!!
On the other hand, those who are against P2P sharing are insistent on the copyright violation angle of file sharing being the wrong side of the technology. They find it rather ridiculous for these sites posting notices that supposedly discourage people from breaking copyright laws when they themselves are being used for the exact same violation. P2P sites claim they do not promote copyright infringement but they are actually providing a venue for this violation to occur. This conflict of interest further adds to the controversy, thus, making the issue ever burning.
Those who are behind P2P technology say they promote only fair use of the files being shared. While this sounds fair enough, it doesn’t really get that fair in reality because the files won’t be shared between two or three people but among multitudes. This will, of course, hurt specifically the music and movie industries that will be losing great amounts of sales because of the mass free distribution. This would also render copyright issues useless because the free massive scale reproduction will have defeated the very purpose of laws pertaining to these issues.
Click Here and Get Tips for Protection in File Sharing!!
When things come down to this, proponents of the technology argue that it will be an individual’s personal discretion, responsibility and accountability that will be involved in whatever he plans to do with the files on the sharing site. Still, being aware of the great possibility that these files could be reproduced in great numbers still appears to put the blame on the site owners.
Click Here for Your Special File Sharing Protection Offer!!
How do I share information between 2 computers in our home.?
December 18, 2010 by admin
Filed under Types of File Sharing
How do I get 2 computers linked so I can share information? Do I need a type of file sharing program? If so , how do I do this?
If you have both computer connected through a router, then you must verify that both have the same workgroup (verify it in My PC properties, computer name), and then you have to share folders, to do it, you must right click the folder to share, and select Share/Security. Open Network places and there you’ll see the folders on each computer.
Click Here and Get Tips for Protection in File Sharing!!
If you don’t have a router or a network, then you have to create one: Get a crossover cable (you can get it in Best Buy or CompUSA) and connect both computers through the RJ45 connection. Right click My PC and select properties, assign a workgroup for both computers (must be the same) and a different computer name. Open network connections in control panel, right click the LAN icon (Local Area Network) and select properties. Double click “TCP/IP” and select “Use the following IP address”, in one PC type 192.168.1.1, gateway 255.255.255.0, the second PC IP: 192.168.1.2, gateway 255.255.255.0 There is no need to assign DNS or other configurations.
Click Here and Get Tips for Protection in File Sharing!!
To share files between computers, follow the first steps as if you have a router. That should work. With these confugurations, you will be able to share files
Click Here for Your Special File Sharing Protection Offer!!
Possession And Dissemination Of Child Pornography – By A Criminal …
June 19, 2010 by admin
Filed under Types of File Sharing
I have been inundated recently by inquiries related to child pornography issues. In our computer age where information, images and videos can be rapidly and easily accessed, this has become a growing area of concern. I handle a great number of cases involving these issues. The charges can be devastating to families and certainly to career aspirations for those convicted. As a result, an aggressive defense is necessary.
Click Here and Get Tips for Protection in File Sharing!!
What happens?
Most cases start with a search warrant and a seizure of equipment which may include computers, hard drives, flash drives, discs, TIVO systems, DVD players, MP3 players, IPODs and anything that can be used to store, view or play images or videos. Search warrants can be acquired when a person reports finding child pornography on a computer. The reporting person may be a family friend, a computer technician that worked on the computer or anyone who has direct or remote access to the system. In some cases, law enforcement personnel use downloaded peer to peer programs to search networked computers for files that include illegal contraband. Finally, police may find accounts and IP addresses when websites posting or promoting contraband images are shut down. Many of these sites, some which are hosted in foreign countries, charge users for access and retain records of users and/or their computer IP addresses. What do we do?
First, and this is critical, NO ONE should make statements to police or outside persons or parties. That means no discussion with family or friends regarding the facts of the case. Nothing that is said is likely to be used by law enforcement for anything other than seeking inculpatory evidence to support criminal charges. Also remember, that law enforcement officers have no obligation to provide the truth when investigating offenses. They may make false statements or promises designed to acquire incriminating evidence or statements from those questioned. Expect officers to makes statements such as:
“”If you have nothing to hide, why won’t you speak to us.”
“”We just want to get your side of the story.”
“”If you don’t talk to us, we will have to make a decision and, with what we have, it likely means charges.”
Do not be baited by such statements. Under such pressure situations, person interviewed often are confused. They may make statements speculating about what “might have” occurred. Those speculative statements are often taken as statements of fact and used later as part of the criminal prosecution. As a result, it is best to think of each word stated as a piece of evidence that can be turned or twisted to support criminal charged. Accordingly, the less that is said, the better. If police investigators wish to speak with you, it is usually wise to politely decline.
Click Here and Get Tips for Protection in File Sharing!!
Second, you should hire counsel immediately. To a great degree, you will be in a waiting game for some time while computer forensics run program scans on the electronic equipment seized. Investigations may last many months to over a year. In the interim, it is important to start interviewing potential computer experts who will have specific knowledge related to the programs used or the caching systems of the various internet browsers. I will explain this a bit more below when I address potential defenses.
Third, do not expect to get your computer equipment back in the short term. It will be quite some time before that occurs. As a result, if a computer is needed, you may wish to replace the equipment with appropriate safeguards to prevent any similar problems.
What about the Charges?
Possession of child pornography is a very serious offense. It should not be taken lightly. It can result in federal charges or state charges depending on the particular facts. It is a felony under Minnesota Statutes Sec. 617.247 and is punishable by up to five years and a fine of not more than $5,000 for a first offense. Dissemination of child pornography is an even more serious offense. A person who disseminates pornographic work to an adult or a minor, knowing or with reason to know its content and character, is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than seven years and a fine of not more than $10,000 for a first offense and for not more than 15 years and a fine of not more than $20,000 for a second or subsequent offense. Moreover, a person convicted must provide a DNA sample and register as a sexual predatory offender under the law. That is true even if the charge is ultimately reduced to something else. Probationary conditions after a conviction often restrict the person’s ability to travel, their computer usage, and contact with minors. In some instances, persons convicted of child pornography offenses must agree to submit to polygraph examinations and/or undergo sexual offender treatment. In other words, the stakes are very high.
What are Some Defenses?
Though defense to child pornography charges vary depending on the particular facts of the case, certain fact patterns and defenses are more common. Ultimately, your defense should be planned only after a complete review of the evidence and circumstances in your case.
First, it should be pointed out that possession of pornography is not a crime. Only possession of child pornography would be criminal. It requires that the actor had an intent. That means the person charged must be proven to have the intent to possess the image(s) and that the person has reason to know of its true content and character.
Second, there are many ways a person can acquire images on a computer which does not mean that they had the requisite intent or knowledge to possess the image. Computers may have many users. That means determining which user may have accessed, downloaded or disseminated contraband child pornography images may be a significant defense issue. Even a one time user of a computer may contaminate its hard drive or cache memory with contraband. That is particularly true for computer systems that share an internet connection such as wireless networks at home.
Additionally, files may also be downloaded blindly without knowing specifically about their content. For example, images may be downloaded by clicking on a link without first reviewing the content of the image being downloaded. This may occur with links found in Newsgroups or other internet settings. Images can also be downloaded in bulk where each image is not reviewed before the download. Two simple examples may be when a person downloads multiple images associated with a Zip file or by highlighting a series of links for download from file sharing programs such as Limewire, MP3 Rocket or Kazaa.
Click Here and Get Tips for Protection in File Sharing!!
Third, several states have ruled that a person cannot be convicted of “possessing” child pornography based on merely viewing pornographic images a home computer. Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin have had similar rulings on the issue. When an image is viewed on a computer, that image is “cached” by the web browser. That means it may exist on the computer without the person ever making an attempt to download the image. Though the person may have been aware of what they were viewing, they may have been unaware that they were automatically downloaded and saved to his computer, and therefore, didn’t “knowingly possess” the pornography as state law requires. Where a statute, such the one existing in Minnesota, lacks specific statutory language prohibiting the mere viewing of pornographic images or evidence that the defendant knowingly downloaded or saved pornographic images to his hard drive or knew that the web browser cached the images, it can be argued that the person charged cannot be criminally liable for viewing images on his computer screen.
Fourth, charges of dissemination of child pornography require that the person has the intent to distribute the images to others. Often, such charges are brought against individuals using file sharing programs. The programs are enticing, offering free access to music, documents, movies and images. They are also free to download from any number of internet sites and essentially network any computers on the internet that download the same or similar programs. When these programs are placed on a computer, they include certain defaults. One of those defaults is to allow others with similar programs on remote computers to view and access data contained in a file designated for sharing on your computer. This is called a peer to peer system. Without knowing how the program defaults work, a person may easily disseminate contraband images without the requisite intent to do so.
Finally, search warrants that are used to seize computers and other equipment with electronic storage capacity may be flawed and unsupported by requisite probable cause. When probable cause is lacking for a warrant, any evidence taken as a result of that unconstitutional seizure may be suppressed and cannot be used at trial.
Certainly, charges of child pornography can be very frightening. However, acting promptly can be important to a strong defense.
“Click Here for Your Special File Sharing Protection Offer !!
By: Lawmoe-29752
Article Directory: http://www.articledashboard.com







